:: ARITHM semantic presentation
theorem E1: :: ARITHM:1
proof
let c
1 be
complex number ;
c
1 in COMPLEX
by XCMPLX_0:def 2;
then consider c
2, c
3 being
Element of
REAL such that E2:
c
1 = [*c2,c3*]
by ARYTM_0:11;
0
= [*0,0*]
by ARYTM_0:def 7;
then c
1 + 0 =
[*(+ c2,0),(+ c3,0)*]
by E2, XCMPLX_0:def 4
.=
[*c2,(+ c3,0)*]
by ARYTM_0:13
.=
c
1
by E2, ARYTM_0:13
;
hence
c
1 + 0
= c
1
;
end;
E2:
- 0 = 0
E3:
opp 0 = 0
theorem E4: :: ARITHM:2
proof
let c
1 be
complex number ;
c
1 in COMPLEX
by XCMPLX_0:def 2;
then consider c
2, c
3 being
Element of
REAL such that E5:
c
1 = [*c2,c3*]
by ARYTM_0:11;
0
= [*0,0*]
by ARYTM_0:def 7;
then c
1 * 0 =
[*(+ (* c2,0),(opp (* c3,0))),(+ (* c2,0),(* c3,0))*]
by E5, XCMPLX_0:def 5
.=
[*(+ (* c2,0),(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),(* c3,0))*]
by ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*(+ (* c2,0),(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),0)*]
by ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*(+ 0,(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),0)*]
by ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*(+ 0,(opp 0)),(+ 0,0)*]
by ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*(+ 0,(opp 0)),0*]
by ARYTM_0:13
.=
[*(opp 0),0*]
by ARYTM_0:13
.=
0
by E3, ARYTM_0:def 7
;
hence
c
1 * 0
= 0
;
end;
E5: one =
succ 0
by ORDINAL2:def 4
.=
1
;
theorem E6: :: ARITHM:3
proof
let c
1 be
complex number ;
c
1 in COMPLEX
by XCMPLX_0:def 2;
then consider c
2, c
3 being
Element of
REAL such that E7:
c
1 = [*c2,c3*]
by ARYTM_0:11;
1
= [*1,0*]
by ARYTM_0:def 7;
then c
1 * 1 =
[*(+ (* c2,1),(opp (* c3,0))),(+ (* c2,0),(* c3,1))*]
by E7, XCMPLX_0:def 5
.=
[*(+ (* c2,1),(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),(* c3,1))*]
by ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*(+ c2,(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),(* c3,1))*]
by E5, ARYTM_0:21
.=
[*(+ c2,(opp 0)),(+ (* c2,0),c3)*]
by E5, ARYTM_0:21
.=
[*(+ c2,0),(+ 0,c3)*]
by E3, ARYTM_0:14
.=
[*c2,(+ 0,c3)*]
by ARYTM_0:13
.=
c
1
by E7, ARYTM_0:13
;
hence
1
* c
1 = c
1
;
end;
theorem :: ARITHM:4
theorem :: ARITHM:5
E7:
1 " = 1
theorem :: ARITHM:6